ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2026
Refinement of histologic subtypes and identification of biomarkers linked to unfavorable prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma: The ENSCCA registries' framework for digital twin advancement.
Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Surgical Approach Influence Benchmark Attainment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma?World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Global patterns of mutational profiles in biliary tract cancer.Journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- Narrative Review of Digital Twins in the Health Domain: Development, Application, and Evidence Consolidation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating Advanced Endoscopic Techniques and Confocal Microscopy for Early Detection of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- When social inequities dictate outcomes: the multidisciplinary call of cholangiocarcinoma.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) displays remarkable anatomical and histological heterogeneity. Besides diagnosis confirmation, histology currently does not have a major role in the management of CCA. We aimed to study the clinical relevance of histological heterogeneity of CCA and putative tissue biomarkers by creating a multicentric digitalized European CCA Histology Registry. APPROACH AND
resultsNine referral centers, participating in the International Cholangiocarcinoma Clinical Registry, shared samples and data from 293 patients. Histological and immunohistochemistry stains (n=10) were performed. Computed tomography (CT) scans (n=112 cases) were analyzed by morphological and radiomics techniques. A selection of cases (n=18) was processed for spatial transcriptomics analysis. No significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) were found in perihilar CCA versus intrahepatic (i) CCA, and in small bile duct (SBD) versus large bile duct (LBD) iCCA. When cases were classified by Periodic acid of Schiff (PAS) positivity (mucin content), PAS HIGH LBD iCCA showed a significantly worse 5-year OS compared to PAS LOW iCCA. Multivariate Cox regression identified PAS HIGH LBD iCCA phenotype as an independent predictor of worse OS. PAS HIGH LBD iCCA subtype showed specific molecular characteristics at spatial transcriptomics and immunohistochemistry; CT scans and serology could distinguish PAS HIGH LBD iCCA phenotype with excellent accuracy.
conclusionsOur data underline the importance of identifying morphological subclasses with a significant prevalence in CCA as a tool for risk stratification and prognosis. The European CCA Histology Registry represents a valuable platform for integrating digital pathology with clinical, radiological, and molecular information as a framework for digital twin advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.