ArticlePloS one2025
Finite element modeling of asymmetric expansion using ATOZTM expander.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asymmetric dentoskeletal expansion is one of the common complications associated with rapid palatal expansion (RPE), often leading to functional and aesthetic concerns. This study investigates the biomechanical performance of ATOZ™ expander using finite element method, with a focus on addressing asymmetrical expansion through expander design modifications. A 3D skull model incorporating teeth and sutures were reconstructed, and two scenarios were analyzed. Model I featured symmetrical suture maturation (stage B), and Model II with asymmetrical suture maturation, particularly more mature zygomatic sutures on the right side (Stage C). Five expander configurations were evaluated in each model. A 0.3 mm total displacement (0.15 mm per side) was applied parallel to the midpalatal suture. Results showed that in Model I, configurations 1, 2, and 3 resulted in relatively symmetrical expansion, while configurations 4 and 5 introduced asymmetry. In Model II, all configurations except configuration 4 demonstrated significant asymmetrical expansion toward the less mature left side. Configuration 4, which included one-sided dental support on the left, was found to redistribute forces and minimize asymmetry. The number of micro-implants had minimal impact on expansion outcomes, while dental support substantially influenced force distribution. These findings suggest that the ATOZ™ expander, especially when configured with one-sided dental support, offers a non-surgical solution to compensate for asymmetrical sutural resistance. This approach may improve clinical outcomes in patients exhibiting unilateral suture maturity and could help reduce the need for surgical intervention such as SARPE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.