Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2025
Intravenous Rehydration for Severe Acute Malnutrition with Gastroenteritis.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of the evidence of cardiac dysfunction and intravenous fluid use among children with severe acute malnutrition and severe dehydration.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Pooled it
- Oral rehydration for severe malnutrition in children with moderate and severe dehydration (GASTROSAM): a phase 2, open-label, superiority randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2026Trial
- Infants and children 6-59 months of age with moderate wasting: evidence gaps identified during WHO guideline development.BMJ global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInternational recommendations advise against the use of intravenous rehydration therapy in children with severe acute malnutrition because of the concern about fluid overload, but evidence to support this concern is lacking. Given the high mortality associated with the current recommendations, the adoption of intravenous rehydration strategies might improve outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a factorial, open-label superiority trial in four countries in Africa. Children 6 months to 12 years of age with severe acute malnutrition with gastroenteritis and dehydration underwent randomization in a 2:1:1 ratio to one of three rehydration strategies: oral rehydration, plus intravenous boluses for shock; a rapid intravenous strategy that consisted of lactated Ringer's solution (100 ml per kilogram of body weight) administered over a period of 3 to 6 hours, with boluses for shock; or a slow intravenous strategy that consisted of the same solution administered over a period of 8 hours, with no boluses. The primary end point was death at 96 hours.
resultsA total of 272 children underwent randomization; 138 were assigned to the oral strategy, 67 to the rapid intravenous strategy, and 67 to the slow intravenous strategy. Participants were followed for 28 days. A nasogastric tube was used for oral rehydration in 126 of 135 participants (93%) in the oral group and in 82 of 126 (65%) in the intravenous groups. Intravenous boluses were administered at admission in 12 participants (9%) in the oral group, 7 (10%) in the rapid intravenous group, and none in the slow intravenous group. At 96 hours, 11 participants (8%) in the oral group and 9 (7%) in the intravenous groups (5 in the rapid group and 4 in the slow group) had died (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 2.52; P = 0.69). At 28 days, 17 participants (12%) in the oral group and 14 (10%) in the intravenous groups had died (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.78). Serious adverse events occurred in 32 participants (23%) in the oral group, 14 (21%) in the rapid intravenous group, and 10 (15%) in the slow intravenous group. No evidence of pulmonary edema, heart failure, or fluid overload was noted.
conclusionsAmong children with severe acute malnutrition and gastroenteritis, no evidence of a difference in mortality at 96 hours was noted between oral and intravenous rehydration strategies. (Funded by the Joint Global Health Trials scheme and others; GASTROSAM Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN76149273.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.