ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025
ABCD: A Simulation Method for Accelerating Conversational Agents With Applications in Aphasia Therapy.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- AQFormer: severity-aware transformer with aphasia-specific CAM for spoken keyword classification in aphasic speech.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Treatment of aphasia in linguistically diverse populations: current and future directions.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Tracking priming-induced language recovery in aphasia with pre-trained language models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDevelopment of aphasia therapies is limited by clinician shortages, patient recruitment challenges, and funding constraints. To address these barriers, we introduce
methodBuilt on OpenAI's GPT-4o as the foundational large language model, Re-Agent and AI-Aphasic were supplemented with external speech-to-text and naturalistic text-to-speech application programming interfaces to create a multiturn, dynamic dialogue system in English. We used it to evaluate Re-Agent's conversational performance across four experimental conditions (CoT + picture, CoT + topic, zero-shot + picture, zero-shot + topic) and aphasic error at two levels: word and discourse errors. Re-Agent's performance was measured using three discourse metrics: global coherence, local coherence, and grammaticality of utterances.
resultsOverall, Re-Agent performed accurately in all the discourse metrics across all levels of semantic parameter, prompting technique and aphasic error. The results also indicated that well-crafted zero-shot prompts induce more direct and logically related responses that are robust to adversarial aphasic speech inputs, whereas CoT might lead to responses that slightly lose local coherence due to additional complex reasoning chains.
conclusionsABCD represents a foundational computational approach to accelerate the innovation and preclinical testing of conversational AI partners for speech-language therapy. ABCD circumvents the barriers of collecting diverse errorful speech samples for clinical conversational AI fine-tuning. As AI systems-including large language models and speech technologies-advance rapidly, ABCD will scale accordingly, further enhancing its potential for clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.