Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512969›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025

ABCD: A Simulation Method for Accelerating Conversational Agents With Applications in Aphasia Therapy.

Gerald C Imaezue, Harikrishna Marampelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gerald C ImaezueDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa.ORCID 0000-0001-6026-6490
Harikrishna MarampellyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa.

Funding

Technology Development ComponentP2CHD101899 · NICHD · REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO D/B/A SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB · PI DEWALD, JULIUS P · 2020 to 2024
$5.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD101899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDevelopment of aphasia therapies is limited by clinician shortages, patient recruitment challenges, and funding constraints. To address these barriers, we introduce

methodBuilt on OpenAI's GPT-4o as the foundational large language model, Re-Agent and AI-Aphasic were supplemented with external speech-to-text and naturalistic text-to-speech application programming interfaces to create a multiturn, dynamic dialogue system in English. We used it to evaluate Re-Agent's conversational performance across four experimental conditions (CoT + picture, CoT + topic, zero-shot + picture, zero-shot + topic) and aphasic error at two levels: word and discourse errors. Re-Agent's performance was measured using three discourse metrics: global coherence, local coherence, and grammaticality of utterances.

resultsOverall, Re-Agent performed accurately in all the discourse metrics across all levels of semantic parameter, prompting technique and aphasic error. The results also indicated that well-crafted zero-shot prompts induce more direct and logically related responses that are robust to adversarial aphasic speech inputs, whereas CoT might lead to responses that slightly lose local coherence due to additional complex reasoning chains.

conclusionsABCD represents a foundational computational approach to accelerate the innovation and preclinical testing of conversational AI partners for speech-language therapy. ABCD circumvents the barriers of collecting diverse errorful speech samples for clinical conversational AI fine-tuning. As AI systems-including large language models and speech technologies-advance rapidly, ABCD will scale accordingly, further enhancing its potential for clinical integration.

Indexed as

AphasiaArtificial IntelligenceCommunicationComputer SimulationLanguage TherapyHumansSpeech

Identifiers

PMID40512969
PMCPMC12263185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.