ArticlePloS one2025
Can the development of cooking skills influence nutritional status and diet in healthy adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Can the development of cooking skills influence nutritional status and diet? A systematic review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Food Agency and Intentions to Improve Cooking Skills Among Korean Young Adults: Demographic Differences and Motivators.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Culinary competency as a protective factor against ultra-processed food consumption and unhealthy cooking practices: a comparative study between type 1 diabetes patients and healthy controls.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cooking skills are defined as the individual knowledge, confidence, and attitude required to perform culinary tasks, which have been studied as a strategy to improve diet and health outcomes. This article describes a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol aiming to assess whether whether intervention-based development of cooking skills improves dietary quality or nutritional status in healthy adults. The protocol follows the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols [PRISMA-P] and has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (PROSPERO: CRD42022385234). Search strategies will be developed based on the combination of descriptors and executed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO databases. Only intervention studies linking cooking skills to dietary outcomes will be included. Two trained researchers will independently select articles, extract data, and assess the risk of bias. The methodological quality of the studies will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions [ROBINS-I] and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework will be employed to assess the quality of evidence. Implementing this protocol will result in the development of a systematic review assessing whether the enhancement of cooking skills can influence the nutritional status and diet of healthy adults. Systematizing this knowledge is important to understanding cooking skills not only as a therapeutic tool when pathologies are present but also as a health prevention strategy. Therefore, the systematic review based on this protocol may contribute to the formulation of effective public health policies aimed at improving nutritional status and diets through the development of cooking skills, thus helping prevent adverse health outcomes such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.