Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512819›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A two-stage random-effects estimator for meta-analyses of the value per statistical life.

Stephen C Newbold, Chris Dockins, Nathalie Simon, Kelly Maguire, Abdullah Muhammad Sakib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen C NewboldDepartment of Economics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7723-445X
Chris DockinsNational Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Nathalie SimonNational Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Kelly MaguireEconomic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8762-606X
Abdullah Muhammad SakibDepartment of Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed and examined the performance of a two-stage random-effects meta-analysis estimator for synthesizing published estimates of the value per statistical life (VSL). The meta-estimation approach accommodates unbalanced panels with one or multiple observations from each independent group of primary estimates, and distinguishes between sampling and non-sampling sources of error, both within and between groups. We used Monte Carlo simulation experiments to test the performance of the meta-estimator on constructed datasets. Simulation results indicate that, when applied to datasets of modest size, the approach performs best when the within-group non-sampling error variances are assumed to be homogeneous among groups. This allows for two levels of non-sampling errors while preserving degrees of freedom and therefore increasing statistical efficiency. Simulation results also show that the estimator compares favorably to several other commonly used meta-analysis estimators, including other two-stage estimators. As a demonstration, we applied the approach to a pre-existing meta-dataset including 113 VSL estimates assembled from 10 revealed preference and 9 stated preference studies conducted in the U.S. and published between 1999 and 2019.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationHumansMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID40512819
PMCPMC12165433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.