ArticlePloS one2025
3D-MRI brain glioma intelligent segmentation based on improved 3D U-net network.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo enhance glioma segmentation, a 3D-MRI intelligent glioma segmentation method based on deep learning is introduced. This method offers significant guidance for medical diagnosis, grading, and treatment strategy selection.
methodsGlioma case data were sourced from the BraTS2023 public dataset. Firstly, we preprocess the dataset, including 3D clipping, resampling, artifact elimination and normalization. Secondly, in order to enhance the perception ability of the network to different scale features, we introduce the space pyramid pool module. Then, by making the model focus on glioma details and suppressing irrelevant background information, we propose a multi-scale fusion attention mechanism; And finally, to address class imbalance and enhance learning of misclassified voxels, a combination of Dice and Focal loss functions was employed, creating a loss function, this method not only maintains the accuracy of segmentation, It also improves the recognition of challenge samples, thus improving the accuracy and generalization of the model in glioma segmentation.
resultsExperimental findings reveal that the enhanced 3D U-Net network model stabilizes training loss at 0.1 after 150 training iterations. The refined model demonstrates superior performance with the highest DSC, Recall, and Precision values of 0.7512, 0.7064, and 0.77451, respectively. In Whole Tumor (WT) segmentation, the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Recall, and Precision scores are 0.9168, 0.9426, and 0.9375, respectively. For Core Tumor (TC) segmentation, these scores are 0.8954, 0.9014, and 0.9369, respectively. In Enhanced Tumor (ET) segmentation, the method achieves DSC, Recall, and Precision values of 0.8674, 0.9045, and 0.9011, respectively.
conclusionsThe DSC, Recall, and Precision indices in the WT, TC, and ET segments using this method are the highest recorded, significantly enhancing glioma segmentation. This improvement bolsters the accuracy and reliability of diagnoses, ultimately providing a scientific foundation for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.