SynthesisPloS one2025
The effectiveness of care bundles for reducing caesarean section safely: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Care bundles, which consist of three or more interventions implemented together, may help address the global rise in caesarean births. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of care bundles designed to reduce caesarean section (CS). MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Embase were searched from January 2000 to June 2024 using terms related to CS and care bundles. Grey literature and professional body websites were also searched. Randomised or non-randomised studies reporting on pregnant or labouring women who received a care bundle designed to reduce CS safely were eligible. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently. Pre-specified outcomes included CS (overall, elective, and emergency), assisted vaginal birth, neonatal admission to intensive care, and care bundle compliance. Meta-analyses were undertaken using Review Manager 5.4 and a random effects model. Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were calculated. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Ten non-randomised studies were included. Care bundles reduced CS overall (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97) and emergency CS (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98). No differences were observed in assisted vaginal birth (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.33) or neonatal admission to intensive care (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.02). Compliance to the care bundles ranged from 50% to 92%. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was very low. Randomised trial research is required to better assess care bundle use in reducing CS safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.