ArticlePLOS global public health2025
The quest for equity in global health is underpinned by neocolonial discourses: A critical discourse analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Food literacy assessment tools for adults: a scoping review of dimensional evolution, cultural adaptation, and potential implications for nursing-related practice.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Decolonizing global health: a scoping review of its key components, proposed actions, and contributors.Global health research and policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global health, as noted in the emerging decolonizing global health literature, is built on power asymmetries and inequities, is centred on individuals and organizations in the global north, and involves a north to south diffusion of ideas and resources. Despite increasing attention paid to the decolonization of global health, there is no universal understanding of what this entails, or what associated agenda(s) may be. We argue that decolonizing global health is not possible without interrogating its many power asymmetries. In this article we demonstrate one example, using a critical discourse analysis of a tremendously influential document, the final report of the World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. This report brought mainstream attention to health inequities and the broader forces that underpin them. We reasoned that a flagship report focused on equity and the social determinants of health would be sensitive to the many power inequities in global health. Our critical discourse analysis reveals normative views that presume inequity, such as Euro-American-centricity and portraying countries of the global south as behind or inferior to those of the global north and requiring support. Also, we find that many country comparisons exclude rich countries, which hides the full extent of global inequity. By drawing attention to the inequities presumed in language, we illuminate the persistence of neocolonial ideas that accept rather than contest unfairness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.