Trial reportInternational wound journal2025
The Potential Role for a Painless Enzymatic Debridement Gel in Wound Bed Preparation for Venous Leg Ulcers-A Dose Escalation Study.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Vicious Cycle of Biofilm, Host Inflammation and Microvascular Insufficiency in Venous Leg Ulcers.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are painful wounds that require thorough debridement to optimise their chances of healing. We sought to assess the impact on debridement pain from the use of tarumase gel in a prospective Phase IIA open-label, multi-centre, dose escalation study and comparing this to historical pain scores derived from a review of surgical and mechanical debridement within similar chronic wound populations. With tarumase gel, no increase in pain over baseline was observed, irrespective of whether pain was assessed 15-30 min after administration or whether the gel had been resident on the wound for 48-72 h. At the highest concentration of tarumase tested [11 U/mL], all reported NRS scores were below 2.90 (categorised as slight pain) with small trends towards a reduction in the pain score from as early as the first application. By contrast, from previous literature, surgical and mechanical debridement, when used without anaesthesia, commonly resulted in pain scores in excess of 50 mm on 100 mm visual analogue scales (VAS), categorised as moderate to severe pain. Pain from surgical/mechanical debridement can be reduced by topical anaesthetic creams; however, this requires at least 30-60 min of application and subsequent removal prior to debridement, making it impractical to use in busy clinic facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.