Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512567›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Enhancing Monte Carlo Tree Search for Retrosynthesis.

Ton M Blackshaw, Joseph C Davies, Kristian T Spoerer, Jonathan D Hirst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ton M BlackshawSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
Joseph C DaviesSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
Kristian T SpoererSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, U.K.
Jonathan D HirstSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-2726-0983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-Assisted Synthesis Programs are increasingly employed by organic chemists. Often, these tools combine neural networks for policy prediction with heuristic search algorithms. We propose two novel enhancements, which we call eUCT and dUCT, to the Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) algorithm. The enhancements were deployed in AiZynthFinder and have been integrated into the open-source electronic lab notebook, AI4Green, available at https://ai4green.app. A memory-efficient stock file was used to reduce the computational carbon footprint. Both enhancements significantly reduced, by up to 50%, the computational clock-time to solve 1500 heavy (500-800 Da) molecules. The dUCT enhancement increased the number of routes found per molecule for the 1500 heavy molecules and a 50,000-molecule set from ChEMBL. eUCT and dUCT-v2 solved between 600 and 900 more molecules than the unenhanced MCTS algorithm across the 50,000 molecules. When limited to a 150 s time constraint, dUCT-v1 solved ∼5 million more routes to the 50,000 targets than the unenhanced algorithm.

Indexed as

Chemistry Techniques, SyntheticMonte Carlo MethodAlgorithmsNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40512567
PMCPMC12264930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.