Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512531›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2025

Spending patterns of middle schools that deliver multiple evidence-based physical activity and nutrition programs.

Gor Kikanian, Lizeth Tapia, Allyson Schaefers, Julie Gardner, Paula Butler, Jacob Szeszulski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gor KikanianSchool of Medicine, Texas A&M University, 8447 Riverside Pkwy, Bryan, TX 77807, USA.
Lizeth TapiaSchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2200 Campbell Street, Commerce, TX 75428, USA.
Allyson SchaefersTexas A&M Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 17360 Coit Rd, Dallas, TX 75252, USA.
Julie GardnerTexas A&M AgriLife Extension, 600 John Kimbrough Boulevard, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Paula ButlerTexas A&M AgriLife Extension, 600 John Kimbrough Boulevard, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Jacob SzeszulskiTexas A&M Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife Research, 17360 Coit Rd, Dallas, TX 75252, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0709-5594

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 933664Texas A&M AgriLife Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity and nutrition programs improve children's health. However, cost and competition for resources between programs are common implementation challenges. Currently, no guidance exists for practitioners about how to spend money within various programs. This study examines spending patterns of schools that concurrently delivered multiple programs to help provide spending guidance. Middle schools (n = 8; 75% rural) that participated in the Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) initiative were provided $3500. To achieve HSRC recognition, schools complete a school-wide walking program, a physical activity or nutrition program for students, and a physical activity or nutrition program for adults (teachers and parents). We tracked purchases, grouped receipts by categories and program, and analyzed spending using descriptive statistics. On average, schools spent $3383.26 ± $159.27. For both adult and teacher incentives, over half of the schools spent $0. Program equipment ($1145.14 ± $1139.10; e.g. cooking equipment and hydroponics kit) was the largest category of spending, followed by student incentives ($945.04 ± $946.62). Schools purchased 5031 items (628.88 ± 926.50 items/school) categorized as small student incentives (e.g. water bottles and gift cards), averaging $1.04 each, and 12 items (1.5 ± 2.78 items/school) on large student incentives (e.g. bike) averaging $124.72 each. On average schools completed 2.88 ± 0.83 (range 2-4) youth programs and 1.50 ± 0.93 (range 0-2) adult programs, which cost around $300-$1500 and $0-$700 per program, respectively. Schools spent almost all the money allocated for HSRC and made strategic spending decisions to maximize student engagement, specifically prioritizing student programs over adult ones. This information about how schools spend their money offers insights for decision-making in future programs.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionSchool Health ServicesSchoolsAdultChildHumansStudentsadolescenthealth behaviorimplementation sciencephysical educationprogram evaluationschool health services

Identifiers

PMID40512531
PMCPMC12466311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.