ArticleJournal of vision2025
Measuring spatial and temporal properties of visual crowding using continuous psychophysics.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual crowding refers to the difficulty in recognizing objects in the periphery when surrounded by clutter. Traditional trial-based paradigms, while effective in measuring spatial aspects of crowding, do not capture the temporal dynamics involved. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of a continuous psychophysics paradigm that measures both the spatial extent and temporal processes of visual crowding. Eight participants continuously tracked the orientation of a rotating Landolt C while the distance between the target and a ring-shaped flanker varied systematically over time. Participants set a reference stimulus to match the orientation of the target. The paradigm included "jump-points," where the orientation of the target suddenly shifted, allowing us to measure the recovery rate of participants' tracking errors following these disruptions. Tracking accuracy was compared between flanked and isolated conditions. Additionally, participants' report errors were used to assess both the crowding extent and the temporal recovery rate from the jumps, with the crowding extent results compared with those obtained from a conventional trial-based version of the paradigm. The recovery rate was calculated by fitting an exponential decay function to participants' report errors after the jumps. The results showed that the crowding extent measured using the continuous paradigm was consistent with that obtained using trial-based methods and aligned with Bouma's rule. Moreover, flankers decreased both tracking accuracy and recovery rate following the jumps. These results demonstrate that our continuous psychophysics paradigm is useful for measuring the spatiotemporal aspects of crowding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.