Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512466›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

Development of a text message intervention designed to promote safe contact lens wear.

Adam B Samuels, Lisa J Keay, Kate E Faasse, Nicole A Carnt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Development of a text message intervention designed to promote safe contact lens wear.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam B SamuelsSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-9462
Lisa J KeaySchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-0678
Kate E FaasseSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3073-3718
Nicole A CarntSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-0885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSome contact lens wearers demonstrate poor compliance with hygiene behaviours which increase their risk of corneal infection. Text message interventions for behaviour change can provide support and education in healthcare domains. This study reports on the co-design of a text message intervention to target hygiene compliance, user satisfaction and discontinuation in contact lens wear.

methodsIn phase 1, draft messages were composed using contact lens compliance advice from peak bodies, which was then optimised for persuasion using behaviour change theory. Phase 2 involved consultation with Patient Advocates (3), Health Psychology Experts (5) and Eyecare Practitioners (11), who rated messages (Likert 1-6) on readability, appropriateness, behaviour change and provided comments. Lay contact lens wearers participated in focus groups (2-4 per group) and provided feedback on relevance, comprehension and likely behaviour change. Phase 3 assessed messages and modified for readability (Flesh-Kincaid). Phase 4 created and pilot tested (n = 5 users) text message sequences.

resultsPhase 1 created 95 messages. In Phase 2, ratings (1-6) of readability (M = 5.4, SD = 0.5), appropriateness (M = 5.3 SD = 0.6) and likelihood to change behaviour (M = 5.0, SD = 0.6) combined with free text comments led to the modification of 59/95 (62%) messages, including the deletion of five messages. Focus group participants (5 groups, n = 14) suggested engagement, educational content and simplification. Most (62/90, 69%) messages were modified, four removed and two new messages proposed. In Phase 3, 88% were assessed as fairly easy or better. Post-modification, all messages were fairly easy, mean readability 82.1 (range: 73.7-91.8, SD = 5.8). Phase 4 created 17 sequences of text messages and pilot testing established the process for replies, opt-outs and modified time-zone delivery.

conclusionCo-designing and evaluating text messages was feasible, resulting in a library of 88 optimised text messages formed into semi-personalised sequences.

Indexed as

Contact LensesHealth PromotionHygienePatient ComplianceText MessagingAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Satisfactionbehaviour changeco‐designcontact lens compliancecontact lens safetyhealth promotiontext message

Identifiers

PMID40512466
PMCPMC12357223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.