Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512436›Full record

ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2025

[Evidence-based approach for premium intraocular lenses: management of postoperative dissatisfaction].

Isabella D Baur, Arthur Mueller, Grzegorz Łabuz, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabella D BaurKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland. Isabella.Baur@uk-augsburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-1359
Arthur MuellerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Grzegorz ŁabuzAugenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland, INF 400, 69120.
Gerd U AuffarthAugenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland, INF 400, 69120.
Ramin KhoramniaKlinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of patients report a high degree of satisfaction after implantation of premium intraocular lenses (IOL); however, cases of postoperative dissatisfaction occasionally occur. The most frequent symptoms are blurred vision and dysphotopsia. The possible causes include a deviation of the target refraction, cystoid macular edema, dry eye, secondary cataract, decentration of the IOL and a large pupil size. A standardized evaluation can help to identify the possible cause and to initiate an adequate treatment when a pathology has been identified. If the complaints are inherent to the IOL optics, an exchange of the IOL is available as a last resort.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineLenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsVision DisordersHumansDysphotopsiaPostoperative dissatisfactionPremium IOLPresbyopia correctionToric IOL

Identifiers

PMID40512436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.