ArticleVirus genes2025
Comparison of two continuous cell lines BHK-21 and IB-IS2 for isolating field serotypes O and A of Foot-and-Mouth disease virus.
Article in Virus genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Opposing fates: a bipolar cellular model for FMDV replication shaped byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly infectious viral infection that has a significant economic impact on livestock farming worldwide. The adaptability of a field isolate of FMDV virus for rapid isolation and production of a high antigen titer is one of the concerns of vaccine preparation, which can delay and endanger effective control programs. During a period between 2019 and 2020, a total of 63 oral epithelial samples were collected from vaccinated cattle. These samples were first analyzed and typed to identify the virus using ELISA method. Subsequently, the field virus was isolated using two continuous cell lines, BHK-21 and IB-IS2. Cytopathic effects (CPE) were observed under an inverted microscope, and then viral titration of isolated viruses was determined. Of 63 samples received from 2019 to 2020, 50 samples (79.36%) were reported positive by type-specific ELISA and typed as follows: 32 samples (64%) were type O, and 18 samples (36%) were type A. Of 50 positive samples, 38 samples (76%) were isolated in the IB-IS2 cell culture (26 samples type O, 12 samples type A) and 12 samples (34%) were isolated in the BHK-21 cell culture (9 samples type O, 3 samples type A) during three consecutive passages. The mean virus titration of isolated viruses was 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
40512422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.