Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512399›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Shaft fractures in children and adolescents: age-appropriate treatment strategies].

Dorien Schneidmüller, Christoph Emanuel Gonser

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dorien SchneidmüllerAbteilung für Kindertraumatologie und Kinderorthopädie, BGU Murnau, Prof.-Küntscher Str. 8, 82418, Murnau, Deutschland. dorien.schneidmueller@bgu-murnau.de.
Christoph Emanuel GonserKlinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, BG-Klinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shaft fractures in children and adolescents differ from those of adulthood in terms of the fracture pattern and treatment. With respect to the procedure, humeral shaft fractures must be differentiated from forearm shaft fractures. Almost no axial deviation can be tolerated on the forearm shaft, even at a young age as this could lead to functional restrictions in the rotation of the forearm. For these reasons, closed reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) nowadays represents the gold standard for dislocated or unstable fractures. A special type is the greenstick fracture of the forearm shaft where there is also a risk of refracture due to the partial healing disorder. In the region of the humeral shaft, residual axial deviations play a role mainly with respect to the cosmetic results. Substantial functional limitations are not to be expected. Many of these fractures can be treated conservatively. In cases of instability or unacceptable dislocation, ESIN osteosynthesis is the first choice as a minimally invasive procedure for surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumeral FracturesRadius FracturesUlna FracturesAdolescentAge FactorsChildHumansElastic stable intramedullary nailingForearmGreenstick fractureHumerusPediatric traumatology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.