Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512386›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025

Toward a general framework for AI-enabled prediction in crop improvement.

Carlos Messina, Julian Garcia-Abadillo, Owen Powell, Shunichiro Tomura, Alina Zare, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Mark Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Breeding perspectives on tackling trait genome-to-phenome (G2P) dimensionality using ensemble-based genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos MessinaUF/IFAS Crop Transformation Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. cmessina@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5501-9281
Julian Garcia-AbadilloUF/IFAS Crop Transformation Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-8908
Owen PowellARC Center of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5131-4286
Shunichiro TomuraARC Center of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Alina ZareElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-7604
Baskar GanapathysubramanianMechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8931-4852
Mark CooperARC Center of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9418-3359

Funding

Australian Research Council CE200100015National Science Foundation 2021-67021-35329National Science Foundation EEC 1941529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageA theoretical framework for AI and ensembled prediction for crop improvement is introduced and demonstrated using the logistic map. Symbolic/sub-symbolic AI-based prediction can increase predictive skill with increase in system complexity. The curse of dimensionality in genomic prediction has been established and hampers genetic gain for complex traits. Artificial intelligence (AI) that fuses symbolic and sub-symbolic approaches to prediction is emerging as an approach that can deal effectively with this problem. By leveraging information across physiological and genetic networks, it is plausible to increase prediction accuracy by harnessing prior knowledge and computation approaches. Ensembles of models de facto implement the diversity prediction theorem, and thus enable breeders identify subnetworks of genetic and physiological networks underpinning crop response to management (M) and environment (E). Here, we introduce a theoretical framework for AI-enabled prediction in crop improvement. This framework brings together elements of dynamical systems modeling, ensembles, Bayesian statistics and optimization. We demonstrate properties of this framework and limits to predictability using a simple logistic map. We show that heritability and level of predictability decrease with increase in system complexity that conforms well with prior empirical evidence. We show that predicting systems states is an inferior strategy to predicting system process rates for complex systems. This holds for both the level of predictability and for the ability to use the data generating functions to produce a view of the system state space that can help breeders develop an intuition for how biological interventions can affect the performance of the crops. By integrating biological knowledge and computational approaches to prediction, it is feasible to increase predictive accuracy in breeding systems and therefore hasten the rate of genetic gain.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCrops, AgriculturalModels, GeneticPlant BreedingBayes TheoremPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID40512386
PMCPMC12166023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.