ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
Toward a general framework for AI-enabled prediction in crop improvement.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ensemble-based genomic prediction for maize flowering time improves prediction accuracy and reveals novel insights into trait genetic variation.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Back to the future 2: the implications of germplasm structure on the balance between short- and long-term genetic gain in a changing target population of environments.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Ensemble AnalySis with Interpretable Genomic Prediction (EasiGP): Computational tool for interpreting ensembles of genomic prediction models.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Breeding perspectives on tackling trait genome-to-phenome (G2P) dimensionality using ensemble-based genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageA theoretical framework for AI and ensembled prediction for crop improvement is introduced and demonstrated using the logistic map. Symbolic/sub-symbolic AI-based prediction can increase predictive skill with increase in system complexity. The curse of dimensionality in genomic prediction has been established and hampers genetic gain for complex traits. Artificial intelligence (AI) that fuses symbolic and sub-symbolic approaches to prediction is emerging as an approach that can deal effectively with this problem. By leveraging information across physiological and genetic networks, it is plausible to increase prediction accuracy by harnessing prior knowledge and computation approaches. Ensembles of models de facto implement the diversity prediction theorem, and thus enable breeders identify subnetworks of genetic and physiological networks underpinning crop response to management (M) and environment (E). Here, we introduce a theoretical framework for AI-enabled prediction in crop improvement. This framework brings together elements of dynamical systems modeling, ensembles, Bayesian statistics and optimization. We demonstrate properties of this framework and limits to predictability using a simple logistic map. We show that heritability and level of predictability decrease with increase in system complexity that conforms well with prior empirical evidence. We show that predicting systems states is an inferior strategy to predicting system process rates for complex systems. This holds for both the level of predictability and for the ability to use the data generating functions to produce a view of the system state space that can help breeders develop an intuition for how biological interventions can affect the performance of the crops. By integrating biological knowledge and computational approaches to prediction, it is feasible to increase predictive accuracy in breeding systems and therefore hasten the rate of genetic gain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.