ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2025
Managing Candida auris in dialysis units: challenges, strategies, and future directions.
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The fungal stronghold: biofilms in hemodialysis catheters, diagnostic pitfalls, and the challenge of catheter salvage.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCandida auris (C. auris) is an emerging fungal pathogen responsible for numerous nosocomial outbreaks worldwide over the past decade. Its resistance to multiple antifungal agents poses a significant challenge in clinical management. In addition, high rates of misdiagnosis and its ability to form biofilms further complicate treatment and control efforts. Immunocompromised patients, particularly those with chronic diseases or invasive medical devices, are at heightened risk. Despite its global prevalence, the true extent of C. auris infections remains uncertain due to several diagnostic challenges. Notably, limited availability of specialized molecular diagnostic tools in resource-limited settings exacerbates the underreporting of infections, leaving the full scope of its impact largely undetected. PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and impact of C. auris on hemodialysis patients, as well as methods for prevention and management of C. auris infections in hemodialysis units.
methodsThis review synthesizes data from peer-reviewed journals and clinical studies addressing C. auris epidemiology, diagnostic challenges, resistance patterns, and infection management, with a focus on patients with chronic kidney failure. Data on biofilm behavior, antifungal efficacy, and infection control practices in hemodialysis environments were analyzed to identify existing knowledge gaps.
resultsCandida auris infections occur more frequently in males (≈60%) and individuals over 65 years of age. The pathogen colonizes various anatomical sites and thrives in hospital settings, withstanding temperatures up to 42 °C and salinity levels up to 3%. Diagnostic errors are frequent: conventional biochemical methods misidentify up to 40% of cases, while molecular diagnostics offer ≥ 95% specificity. Existing antifungal lock solutions show limited effectiveness (50-60%), whereas hemodialysis patients are 3-4 times more likely to develop bloodstream infections due to the use of central venous catheters. Novel experimental antifungal combinations yield > 80% eradication rates in preclinical settings.
conclusionCandida auris presents a significant threat to hemodialysis patients due to its resilience, misdiagnosis rates, and treatment resistance. Actionable recommendations include implementing molecular diagnostics in high-risk settings, developing targeted antifungal lock protocols, and enhancing surface decontamination practices in dialysis units to prevent biofilm formation and pathogen transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40512330What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.