SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline and cyclophosphamide in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Literature Overview.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Inhibition of DDX3 modulates immune signaling in aggressive breast cancers.Cancer letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy has become the standard neoadjuvant regimen for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the KEYNOTE-522 trial did not use dose-dense (dd) anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) as part of its chemotherapy backbone. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ddAC in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) and pembrolizumab.
methodsA systematic search was conducted to identify studies evaluating neoadjuvant ddAC in combination with CT and pembrolizumab, with or without comparisons to 3-weekly AC in TNBC. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects model for studies comparing two schedules, and single-arm proportional meta-analysis to summarize endpoints for dose-dense regimen.
resultsFour observational studies, comprising 535 patients (329 receiving ddAC and 206 receiving 3-weekly AC), met the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared the two schedules, while one evaluated ddAC. No difference in pCR was observed between both schedules (66.1% vs. 61.6%; RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.94-1.28; p = 0.25). However, patients receiving ddAC experienced higher incidence of grade III-IV adverse events (43.7% vs. 29.7%; RR 1.65; 95% CI 1.15-2.37; p = 0.007). No differences were found in dose modifications or treatment delays between the two schedules. In the combined analysis of studies evaluating ddAC, the overall pCR was 63%, with a 40% incidence of treatment delays. No included studies reported survival data for ddAC patients.
conclusionNeoadjuvant pembrolizumab with ddAC demonstrated a pCR incidence comparable to that reported in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. When compared to 3-weekly AC, ddAC was associated with a higher toxicity, with no difference in pCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40512324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.