SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025
Rash associated with antibiotic administration in patients with infectious mononucleosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The HIF-1α-Th17/Treg axis in pediatric infectious mononucleosis: a clinical investigation of metabolic-immune dysregulation.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the proportion of patients with infectious mononucleosis who develop a rash after antibiotic administration, primarily aminopenicillins, and to examine the association between antibiotic use and the risk of rash. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to 09/2024. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A primary and secondary meta-analysis of proportions and odds ratios, respectively, was conducted with random-effect models. In total, 15 observational studies (6 during 1967–1976 and 9 during 2012–2024, with 3153 patients) and 34 case reports were evaluated. The pooled estimate of the proportion of patients with infectious mononucleosis who developed a rash after administration of an aminopenicillin was 43% (95% CI 18–72%), 15% (95% CI 10–22%) after administration of other antibiotics, and 14% (95% CI 10–19%) after no antibiotic use. In subgroup analysis by publication year, the pooled estimate of the proportion of patients with a rash after aminopenicillin was 84% (95% CI 67–93%) in old studies (1967–1976) and 18% (95% CI 10–30%) in recent studies (2012–2024). The secondary analysis showed a significantly increased risk of rash associated with aminopenicillin (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.8–16.3; I2 = 89%) compared to no antibiotic use. Sensitivity analyses based on the patient’s age and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale did not reduce the high heterogeneity. This study demonstrated that the occurrence of rash in patients with infectious mononucleosis after administration of an aminopenicillin is much lower than the medical community believes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40512251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.