Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512199›Full record

ReviewPediatric cardiology2026

Promoting Advancements in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology Amid Clinical Trial Challenges.

Nadia Chaudhry-Waterman, Kristin M Burns, Gail D Pearson, Shelley D Miyamoto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadia Chaudhry-WatermanUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, USA. nadiacwaterman91@gmail.com.
Kristin M BurnsNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, USA.
Gail D PearsonNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, USA.
Shelley D MiyamotoUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric heart disease across the lifespan, an increasing number of these patients are surviving well into adulthood. However, compared to our adult cardiology colleagues, pediatric cardiologists do not have nearly as much evidence to guide the management of their patients. The heterogeneity of diagnoses and the relatively small number of individuals affected by each condition pose challenges in achieving adequate study power. The broad spectrum of potential morbidities and unique pathophysiology associated with the different conditions makes identifying clinically meaningful and achievable study endpoints particularly complex. In addition, recruitment and retention of study participants is difficult due to the fragile nature of patients as well as the regionalization of cardiac care, which results in long distances from study sites for many patients and families. In the past few decades, researchers in the field of pediatric and congenital cardiology have established several multicenter registries, programs, learning networks, and other collaborative efforts to help address these issues. While not a comprehensive review, this paper, which arose in part from the 2023 CardioVascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) forum, will describe some of the most significant and impactful pediatric cardiology clinical research efforts to date and will emphasize areas that require ongoing focused attention.

Indexed as

CardiologyClinical Trials as TopicHeart Defects, CongenitalPediatricsChildHumansClinical trialsCongenital cardiologyLearning networksPediatric cardiologyRegistries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.