ReviewPediatric cardiology2026
Promoting Advancements in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology Amid Clinical Trial Challenges.
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric heart disease across the lifespan, an increasing number of these patients are surviving well into adulthood. However, compared to our adult cardiology colleagues, pediatric cardiologists do not have nearly as much evidence to guide the management of their patients. The heterogeneity of diagnoses and the relatively small number of individuals affected by each condition pose challenges in achieving adequate study power. The broad spectrum of potential morbidities and unique pathophysiology associated with the different conditions makes identifying clinically meaningful and achievable study endpoints particularly complex. In addition, recruitment and retention of study participants is difficult due to the fragile nature of patients as well as the regionalization of cardiac care, which results in long distances from study sites for many patients and families. In the past few decades, researchers in the field of pediatric and congenital cardiology have established several multicenter registries, programs, learning networks, and other collaborative efforts to help address these issues. While not a comprehensive review, this paper, which arose in part from the 2023 CardioVascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) forum, will describe some of the most significant and impactful pediatric cardiology clinical research efforts to date and will emphasize areas that require ongoing focused attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40512199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.