Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512187›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2025

Efficacy and safety of Glofitamab in patients with R/R DLBCL in real life setting- a retrospective study.

Ronit Gurion, Dmitri Guz, Meirav Kedmi, Chava Perry, Irit Avivi, Netanel A Horowitz, Uri Abadi, Anat Gafter-Gvili, Pia Raanani, Neta Goldschmidt and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ronit GurionInstitute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah- Tikva, Israel.
Dmitri GuzFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Meirav KedmiFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Chava PerryFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Irit AviviFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Netanel A HorowitzDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Uri AbadiFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Anat Gafter-GviliInstitute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah- Tikva, Israel.
Pia RaananiInstitute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah- Tikva, Israel.
Neta GoldschmidtDepartment of Hematology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Boaz Nachmias *Department of Hematology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shlomzion Aumann *Department of Hematology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. aumann@hadassah.org.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glofitamab, a CD20-directed CD3 T-cell engager, was recently FDA-approved after demonstrating a 52% overall response rate (ORR) and a 39% complete response (CR) rate in heavily pretreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, real-world data on its efficacy and safety remain limited. This study evaluated glofitamab's performance in clinical practice. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL treated via a national compassionate use program. Patients received at least one dose of glofitamab after failing ≥ 2 prior therapies. Recruitment spanned September 2020-January 2023. Outcomes included ORR, CR (per Lugano criteria), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Adverse events were classified per ASTCT 2019 criteria, and risk factors for PFS and OS were assessed via logistic regression. Thirty-five patients from six Israeli centers were included (median age: 67 years; 66% male). The median number of prior therapies was 5, with 43% being primary refractory and 91% post-CAR-T therapy. ORR was 34%, with 14% achieving CR. Median PFS and OS were 2 and 4 months, respectively. Treatment was prematurely discontinued in 86%, mainly due to disease progression (46%) and to infections in responding patients (17%). Male sex was a significant risk factor for poor PFS and OS. In this real-world cohort, glofitamab's efficacy was lower than in clinical trials, likely due to a more heavily pretreated population. However, its manageable toxicity supports its potential role in r/r DLBCL treatment.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeCAR-T failureDiffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL)GlofitamabReal-world dataRelapsed/refractory lymphomaT-cell engager

Identifiers

PMID40512187
PMCPMC12334432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.