ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2025
Immune-modulatory effects of Spindlin-1 inhibitors.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spindlin-1, a multivalent epigenetic reader, is a new target for cancer therapy. Beside the anticancer effect, modulation of the recognition of methyl marks of histones may impact the immune system, which plays an important role in the anticancer strategy of the human organism. Two Spindlin-1 inhibitors (A366, MS31) were characterized to differentiate between drug and target-specific effects. We performed a comprehensive study regarding the influence of Spindlin-1 inhibition on various immune cells. A366 and MS31 showed immune cell type-dependent cytotoxicity with IC50 values in the ranges of 37-143 µM and 11-3122 µM, respectively, macrophages tending to be less susceptible than lymphocytes. A366 had only minor effects on M1 polarization, whereas MS31 shifted the M1 to a M2 phenotype, as shown by regulated cytokines and surface marker expression. Both A366 and MS31 weakened the polarization of predifferentiated M2 macrophages by reducing surface marker expression, cytokines, and inflammatory markers. A366 and MS31 had no effect on activation and energy metabolism of CD4+ T cells. Interestingly, 5 µM A366 and 2.5 µM MS31 clearly prevented B cell activation, as shown by reduced proliferation, plasmablast formation, and release of immunoglobulins A and G. Additionally, A366 increased energy metabolism in B cells. In conclusion, the inhibition of Spindlin-1 had only minor effects on polarization of macrophages and T cell proliferation but profoundly prevented B cell activation at low concentrations. This suggests that Spindlin-1 inhibitors, while mediating anticancerogenic effects, may also suppress the humoral immune response and increase infection risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.