Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40512032›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2025

Agreement between Routine-Dose and Lower-Dose CT with and without Deep Learning-based Denoising for Active Surveillance of Solid Small Renal Masses: A Multiobserver Study.

Jens Borgbjerg, Bendik Stensby Breen, Cathrine Helgestad Kristiansen, Nis Elbrønd Larsen, Lise Medrud, Rasa Mikalone, Stig Müller, Gintare Naujokaite, Anne Negård, Tommy Kjærgård Nielsen and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jens BorgbjergDepartment of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478 Lorenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1333-3993
Bendik Stensby BreenDepartment of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478 Lorenskog, Norway.ORCID 0009-0005-9647-6330
Cathrine Helgestad KristiansenDepartment of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478 Lorenskog, Norway.
Nis Elbrønd LarsenDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lise MedrudDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rasa MikaloneDepartment of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Stig MüllerDepartment of Urology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway.
Gintare NaujokaiteDepartment of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne NegårdDepartment of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478 Lorenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7624-5595
Tommy Kjærgård NielsenDepartment of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ivar Mjåland SalteDepartment of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478 Lorenskog, Norway.
Jens Brøndum FrøkjærDepartment of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To assess the agreement between routine-dose (RD) and lower-dose (LD) contrast-enhanced CT scans, with and without Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-based deep learning-based denoising (DLD), in evaluating small renal masses (SRMs) during active surveillance. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, CT scans from patients undergoing active surveillance for an SRM were included. Using a validated simulation technique, LD CT images were generated from the RD images to simulate 75% (LD75) and 90% (LD90) radiation dose reductions. Two additional LD image sets, in which the DLD was applied (LD75-DLD and LD90-DLD), were generated. Between January 2023 and June 2024, nine radiologists from three institutions independently evaluated 350 CT scans across five datasets for tumor size, tumor nearness to the collecting system (TN), and tumor shape irregularity (TSI), and interobserver reproducibility and agreement were assessed using the 95% limits of agreement with the mean (LOAM) and Gwet AC2 coefficient, respectively. Subjective and quantitative image quality assessments were also performed. Results The study sample included 70 patients (mean age, 73.2 years ± 9.2 [SD]; 48 male, 22 female). LD75 CT was found to be in agreement with RD scans for assessing SRM diameter, with a LOAM of ±2.4 mm (95% CI: 2.3, 2.6) for LD75 compared with ±2.2 mm (95% CI: 2.1, 2.4) for RD. However, a 90% dose reduction compromised reproducibility (LOAM ±3.0 mm; 95% CI: 2.8, 3.2). LD90-DLD preserved measurement reproducibility (LOAM ±2.4 mm; 95% CI: 2.3, 2.6). Observer agreement was comparable between TN and TSI assessments across all image sets, with no statistically significant differences identified (all comparisons

Indexed as

Deep LearningKidney NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaCTKidneyObserver PerformanceRadiation SafetyTechnology AssessmentUrinary

Identifiers

PMID40512032
PMCPMC12304545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.