Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511920›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2025

Design of SARS-CoV-2 RBD immunogens to focus immune responses toward conserved coronavirus epitopes.

Caitlin Harris, A Brenda Kapingidza, James E San, Jayani Christopher, Tyler Gavitt, Brianna Rhodes, Katarzyna Janowska, Christopher O'Donnell, Jared Lindenberger, Xiao Huang and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Caitlin Harris *Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8793-1662
A Brenda Kapingidza *Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
James E SanDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jayani ChristopherDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Tyler GavittDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Brianna RhodesDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Katarzyna JanowskaDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Christopher O'DonnellDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jared LindenbergerDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Xiao HuangDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Salam SammourDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Madison BerryDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Maggie BarrDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rob ParksDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Amanda NewmanDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mary OvertonDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Thomas OguinDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8959-4025
Priyamvada AcharyaDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Barton F HaynesDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7643-9023
Kevin O SaundersDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kevin WieheDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mihai L AzoiteiDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7198-1162

Funding

Project 4: Computational panbetaCoV immunogen designP01AI158571 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F. · 2021 to 2023
$28.0M
Novel Immunogens to Elicit Broadly Cross-reactive Antibodies That Target the Hemagglutinin Head Trimer InterfaceR01AI155804 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AZOITEI, MIHAI LUCHIAN · 2021 to 2024
$3.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI158571NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, with new variants emerging that evade pre-existing immunity and limit the efficacy of existing vaccines. One approach toward developing superior, variant-proof vaccines is to engineer immunogens that preferentially elicit antibodies with broad cross-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants by targeting conserved epitopes on spike. The inner and outer faces of the receptor binding domain (RBD) are two such conserved regions targeted by antibodies that recognize diverse human and animal coronaviruses. To promote the elicitation of such antibodies by vaccination, we engineered "resurfaced" RBD immunogens that contained mutations at exposed RBD residues outside the target epitopes. In the context of pre-existing immunity, these vaccine candidates aim to disfavor the elicitation of strain-specific antibodies against the immunodominant receptor binding motif (RBM) while boosting the induction of inner and outer face antibodies. The engineered resurfaced RBD immunogens were stable, lacked binding to monoclonal antibodies with limited breadth, and maintained strong interactions with target broadly neutralizing antibodies. When used as vaccines, they limited humoral responses against the RBM as intended. Multimerization on nanoparticles further increased the immunogenicity of the resurfaced RBD immunogens, thus supporting resurfacing as a promising immunogen design approach to rationally shift natural immune responses to develop more protective vaccines.IMPORTANCESARS-CoV-2 is the third coronavirus to cause significant human disease over the last two decades. Despite their success in preventing serious disease, current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines must be updated regularly to match the circulating strains for continued protection. Therefore, it would be advantageous to develop vaccines that protect more broadly against SARS-CoV-2, its variants, and other pre-emergent coronaviruses. This may be achieved by preferentially eliciting antibodies against conserved regions of the spike protein that decorates the virus. Toward this goal, we engineered vaccine candidates to target the conserved inner and outer domains of the Receptor Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2, by altering the surface of the wild-type protein such that strain-specific antibodies that bind outside these regions are no longer recognized. When used in animals with pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity, these molecules reduce the elicitation of variant-specific antibodies, thus providing a blueprint to alter the natural immunodominance hierarchies of SARS-CoV-2 proteins.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEpitopesSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralFemaleHumansMiceProtein DomainsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2immunogen designRBDSARS-CoV-2 vaccinesvaccine design

Identifiers

PMID40511920
PMCPMC12282168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.