Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511836›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Designing a Flexible and Inclusive Approach for Public and Community Involvement in Research With People Who Are Homeless or Vulnerably Housed: Critical Reflections From the I Am More Than… Project.

Mel Hughes, Kate Jupp, Cathy Beresford, Jim Robertson, Annabel Wathen, Tanya Bailey, Siobhan Lennon-Patience, Mike Graham, Deano Pickering, Helena Posnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mel HughesFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4599-104X
Kate JuppBournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Cathy BeresfordBournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-3465
Jim RobertsonThe Lantern Trust, Weymouth, UK.
Annabel WathenThe HealthBus Trust, Bournemouth, UK.
Tanya BaileyThe Lantern Trust, Weymouth, UK.
Siobhan Lennon-PatienceHelp and Kindness, Dorchester, UK.
Mike GrahamThe Lantern Trust, Weymouth, UK.
Deano PickeringThe HealthBus Trust, Bournemouth, UK.
Helena PosnettDorset Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.

Funding

This activity was funded through the ICS Research Engagement Network (REN) development programme and the NIHR Clinical Research Network (CRN) Wessex. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of NHS England, the Department of Health and Social Care or NIHR.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who are homeless or vulnerably housed face significant health inequities and yet are rarely involved in health and social care research as participants, public contributors or co-researchers. The I Am More Than… project was developed to address this lack of inclusion by working in partnership with community organisations and individuals with lived experiences of being homeless or vulnerably housed.

objectiveTo co-design a flexible and inclusive approach for public and community involvement in research (sometimes referred to as public and patient involvement or PPI).

methodsThe project drew on a range of co-production and participatory research strategies, with input from various stakeholders, to identify and address enablers and barriers to participation. Community researchers with lived experience of homelessness or being vulnerably housed were central to all stages of the project, including the co-design of strategies to engage people through conversations, interviews, creative outputs and stakeholder events.

findingsWe identified core principles for inclusive public and community involvement in research. including the need to: develop relationships first and tasks second; gain a deep understanding of communities and their priorities; harness lived experience expertise; however someone may choose to share it; go at the pace of trust; and work in partnership with voluntary and community sector organisations who are embedded in their communities.

conclusionDeveloping a flexible and inclusive approach to public and community involvement in research required shifting from a transactional approach to a relational approach. The project demonstrated the importance of building trust, working in partnership and being flexible and responsive to people's everyday realities for genuine inclusion to be achieved. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This is a co-produced project between a university, an integrated care system, two community organisations and people experiencing homelessness or being vulnerably housed. Individuals with lived experience participated as community researchers, shaping the design, methods and outcomes. Their contributions are detailed throughout the paper, which is co-authored by members of the project team, including staff from two community organisations and one community researcher.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationIll-Housed PersonsVulnerable PopulationsHumansResearch Designcommunityco‐productionhomelessnessinclusive researchparticipatorypartnershipspublic involvement

Identifiers

PMID40511836
PMCPMC12163938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.