ArticleCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening2026
Antimicrobial Activities of Five Different Soap Types Combined with an Extract from Eucalyptus camaldulensis.
Article in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSoaps are vital for preserving our health and personal hygiene since they not only eliminate germs but also rid the body of pollutants.
methodThe current study aims to determine the physicochemical and antibacterial properties of Eucalyptus camaldulensis leaves using the agar disc diffusion technique and assess the effectiveness of different branded liquid soaps (25 mg/ml, 50 mg/ml, 75 mg/ml, and 100 mg/ml) with the Eucalyptus leaf extract against skin-infecting human pathogenic bacteria.
resultsThe combined antimicrobial susceptibility of E. camaldulensis and five liquid soaps showed an inhibition zone of 17.67±0.58, 13.33±0.58, 12.67±0.58, and 15.67±0.58 against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. The antibacterial properties of Av soap by itself did not work against S. pyogenes. Nevertheless, the extract and DI together showed a detrimental effect against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, with no halo forming. DISCUSSION: The absence of inhibition zones for the extract combined with DI against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa may indicate antagonistic interactions or reduced efficacy in that formulation. Overall, the data highlight the potential of E. camaldulensis to improve the antimicrobial properties of commercial soaps, though the effectiveness varies with microbial strain and formulation.
conclusionAntimicrobial activity was observed to increase with higher concentrations of the soap-extract combinations. Although liquid soap (seve) was effective against bacterial isolates, a combination of eucalyptus and aqua vera was shown to be more effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40511833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.