Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511797›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

A multiplex of connectome trajectories enables several connectivity patterns in parallel.

Parham Mostame, Jonathan Wirsich, Thomas Alderson, Ben Ridley, Anne-Lise Giraud, David W Carmichael, Serge Vulliemoz, Maxime Guye, Louis Lemieux, Sepideh Sadaghiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Shared spatial and temporal principles govern connectome dynamics across timescales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Parham MostameDepartment of psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1353-1551
Jonathan WirsichEEG and Epilepsy Unit, University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-9710
Thomas AldersonDepartment of psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States.
Ben RidleyAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France.
Anne-Lise GiraudDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
David W CarmichaelDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Serge VulliemozEEG and Epilepsy Unit, University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maxime GuyeAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France.
Louis LemieuxDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Sepideh SadaghianiDepartment of psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States.

Funding

Cognitive Significance of Functional Connectome StatesR01MH116226 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SADAGHIANI, SEPIDEH · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Medical Research Council, United Kingdom G0301067National Institute for Mental Health 1R01MH116226NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116226Swiss National Science Foundation 192749Swiss National Science Foundation CRSII5_209470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex brain function comprises a multitude of neural operations in parallel and often at different speeds. Each of these operations is carried out across a network of distributed brain regions. How multiple distributed processes are facilitated in parallel is largely unknown. We postulate that such processing relies on a multiplex of dynamic network patterns emerging in parallel but from different functional connectivity (FC) timescales. Given the dominance of inherently slow fMRI in network science, it is unknown whether the brain leverages such multi-timescale network dynamics. We studied FC dynamics concurrently across a breadth of timescales (from infraslow to γ-range) in rare, simultaneously recorded intracranial EEG and fMRI in humans, and source-localized scalp EEG-fMRI data in humans. We examined spatial and temporal convergence of connectome trajectories across timescales. 'Spatial convergence' refers to spatially similar EEG and fMRI connectome patterns, while 'temporal convergence' signifies the more specific case of spatial convergence at corresponding timepoints in EEG and fMRI. We observed spatial convergence but temporal divergence across FC timescales; connectome states (recurrent FC patterns) with partial spatial similarity were found in fMRI and all EEG frequency bands, but these occurred asynchronously across FC timescales. Our findings suggest that hemodynamic and frequency-specific electrophysiological signals, while involving similar large-scale networks, represent functionally distinct connectome trajectories that operate at different FC speeds and in parallel. This multiplex is poised to enable concurrent connectivity across multiple sets of brain regions independently.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeNerve NetAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultconcurrentconnectome dynamicsfMRIfunctinoal connectomehumanintracranial EEGmultiplexneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID40511797
PMCPMC12165690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.