Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511760›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2025

Experimental wounding models of different bullet types and diameters on extremities.

Ilknur Arslan, Gökhan İbrahim Öğünç, Özhan Pazarcı, Ahmet Hilal, Mehmet Eryılmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilknur ArslanAdana City Training and Research Hospital, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Adana-Türkiye.
Gökhan İbrahim ÖğünçDepartment of Criminalistics, Gendarmerie and Coast Guard Academy, Institute of Forensic Sciences, Ankara-Türkiye.
Özhan PazarcıHealth Science University, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic, Adana-Türkiye.
Ahmet HilalDepartment of Forensic Sciences, Çukurova University, Adana-Türkiye.
Mehmet EryılmazDepartment of General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Gulhane Training And Research Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGunshot wounds are the second leading cause of life-threatening injuries and frequently affect the extremities, accounting for 63% of combat-related cases over the past 50 years. Although extremity injuries have lower mortality rates, they still require urgent treatment to reduce complications. Wound ballistics studies often use tissue surrogates like ballistic wax and gelatin, which have limitations due to their dissimilarity to living tissues. There is insufficient data on the effects of gunshots on extremities composed of bone and muscle, which differ in resistance and elasticity. This study aims to analyze the damage caused by commonly used ammunition in living tissue and provide healthcare professionals with critical insights to improve emergency care.

methodsThe study involved six Adana-breed sheep, aged 3-4 years, previously used in another study and showing no vital signs. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee. Test shots were conducted using 9×19 mm (M822), 5.56×45 mm (SS109), and 7.62×51 mm (M80) bullets from a distance of 300 cm, targeting the front legs of sheep positioned laterally. Following the shots, entry and exit wounds were photographed, and anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of the extremities were taken for analysis. The aim was to examine the effects of different types of ammunition on extremities and provide insights into the characteristics of gunshot wounds.

resultsIn the first test group (subjects A and B), X-ray imaging revealed joint integrity loss, multi-part fractures, and cavitation in the soft tissue, with bone fragments distributed along the exit trajectory. No bullet fragments were found within the wound cavity. The M822 bullet produced a typical entry wound and a smaller, more defined exit wound. In the second group (subjects C and D), SS109 bullets caused fragmentation of bone, muscle, tendon, and skin. Bullet fragments created a shrapnel-like effect. The exit wounds were larger and had irregular edges. In the third group (subjects E and F), M80 bullets caused extensive tissue disruption due to their high kinetic energy. The resulting exit wounds were wide and irregular.

conclusionThis study found that M80 bullets caused the most severe bone and soft tissue damage compared to M822 and SS109 bullets, primarily due to their higher kinetic energy density and structural characteristics. Unlike prior research using synthetic tissue models, this study demonstrates the real-tissue effects of different ammunition types. Radiologists, forensic medicine experts, and other healthcare professionals should be aware that firearm injuries vary depending on the bullet's characteristics. Applying this understanding can lead to appropriate diagnoses and improved treatment strategies, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

ExtremitiesWounds, GunshotAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalForensic BallisticsSheep

Identifiers

PMID40511760
PMCPMC12183482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.