Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511672›Full record

ArticleJournal of agromedicine2025

Assessing Engagement, Needs, and Resources to Promote Child and Youth Safety on the Farm and Ranch.

Cheryl L Beseler, Andrea V R Swenson, Christopher A Wanat, Whitney Pennington, Marsha Cheyney, Cassandra Peltier, Alma Jordan, Marsha Salzwedel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agromedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cheryl L BeselerDepartment of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2135-3839
Andrea V R SwensonNational Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Christopher A WanatNational Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Whitney PenningtonDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Marsha CheyneyGreat Plains Center for Agricultural Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Cassandra PeltierNational Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.
Alma JordanAgriKids, Ashbawn, Clorballis, Julianstown, Co Meath, Ireland.
Marsha SalzwedelNational Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH007548NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH008085NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH009568NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH010162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Childhood Agricultural Safety Network (CASN) is a coalition of diverse individuals and organizations working together to safeguard children in agriculture. This study assessed CASN memberships' interests, priorities, and use of resources to help plan future activities and assess member engagement and satisfaction. We electronically surveyed 201 CASN members; 60 responded (29.85%). Respondents were asked about their affiliations, participation in agricultural associations, past and future level of engagement, agricultural safety interests, use of agricultural resources, and future activities of interest. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to understand heterogeneity in the CASN members based on their selected interests. Classes were then tested in logistic regression models to determine how they might differ based on how much of a problem they perceived injury in youth to be, their level of past and future engagement, and their years with CASN. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate effect sizes. Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the patterns of use of resources by respondents. Frequencies were reported for use of resources and future interests. Two groups of CASN members were identified based on reported topics of interest. Specialists (58.9%) were focused on the use of motorized vehicles and roadways. The second group, Generalists (41.1%), had more diverse interests. The two groups differed on how seriously they viewed the problem of agricultural injury in youth (Generalist vs Specialist: OR = 6.27; 1.56, 25.2) and their interest in participating in future CASN activities (Generalist vs. Specialist: OR = 8.75; 1.76, 43.5). The use of 11 resources fell into two patterns. Nearly half of respondents reported current use of the Ag Youth Work Guidelines, Ag Injury News, and the Child Ag Injury Prevention Workshop. CASN is heterogeneous in their agricultural interests around youth safety and their use of resources. In planning future campaigns, it is important to meet the needs of both groups, with activities planned around ATV/UTV and roadway safety and keeping young children out of the worksite, as well as specific topics of concern such as manure ponds, skid steers, and agritourism.

Indexed as

AgricultureAccidents, OccupationalAdolescentAdultChildFarmersFarmsFemaleHumansMaleOccupational HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesAgricultural injuryexploratory factor analysisinjury preventionlatent class analysisyouth injuries

Identifiers

PMID40511672
PMCPMC13020576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.