Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511634›Full record

ArticlePhysiologia plantarum

Modelling Net CO

Alicia V Perera-Castro, Miquel Nadal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modelling Net COPhysiologia plantarum
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alicia V Perera-CastroDepartment of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain.
Miquel NadalAgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Silva, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.

Funding

EU H2020 INTERACT TA 871120MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Next Generation EU/PRTR FJC2020-043902-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photosynthesis and respiration respond differently to the combined effects of temperature and water status. Quantifying their responses is crucial to predict the carbon balance of Sphagnum peatlands in different scenarios of climate change. A first approach was done for two Sphagnum species inhabiting a boreal peatland in Finland. Gas exchange at different temperatures and moss hydration were measured to model net assimilation using simultaneous measurements of photosynthesis and dark respiration. In addition, measurements of moss surface temperature at different water content were performed in the field, covering natural conditions of sun exposure and air temperature. We also accounted for the interaction effect between moss canopy temperature and air temperature, radiation, and water content. Our model accurately predicted net assimilation and was used to estimate net primary productivity based on meteorological inputs and moss water content. The two Sphagnum species presented optimum temperatures for net CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideSphagnopsidaWaterClimate ChangeModels, BiologicalPhotosynthesisTemperatureCarbon DioxideWatercarbon balancephotoperiodprimary productivityrespirationSphagnum

Identifiers

PMID40511634
PMCPMC12163974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.