ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2025
The Efficacy and Sustainability of an Implementation Intervention (FOCUS Program) on Linkage to Hepatitis C Care Time at a Community Health Center in the Deep South: A Longitudinal Study Based on Electronic Medical Records.
Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with hepatitis C should be identified and promptly linked to care after diagnosis to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection by 2030. An implementation intervention, an HCV screening and linkage to care intervention, the FOCUS program, highlighted by four pillars (normalisation of routine testing, promotion of testing based on electronic medical records [EMR], procedure overseen by linkage coordinator, and quality improvement training/feedback among staff), has been conducted in a community health center in South Carolina from 2018 to 2020. We aim to assess the impacts of this intervention on linkage to care time and its sustainability. We analysed a cohort (n = 593) of adults who tested positive for hepatitis C infection, all of whom received hepatitis C care services from the Cooperative Health Center (January 2015 to March 2023) from the EMR data. Descriptive analysis was employed for outcome (linkage to care days [LTC days]) and sociodemographic variables (i.e., race, sex, age, health insurance). We compared the sociodemographic and average LTC days among pre-intervention (2015-2017), during-intervention (2018-2020), and post-intervention (2021-2023) phases. Multivariate linear regressions were conducted on LTC days and intervention phases, controlling for relevant covariates. Most (59.5%) of the participants were 45 to 64 years of age. Sixty percent were males, and 57% were African Americans. Around 45% of the participants did not have health insurance. The mean LTC days at pre-intervention were 66.68 (SD = 72.29). LTC days reduced by 31 days during the intervention compared to pre-intervention (ß = -31.21, p < 0.001). Similarly, in the post-intervention phase, LTC days reduced by 30 days compared to pre-intervention (ß = -29.96, p < 0.001). Age was associated with LTC days, with middle-aged people (45-64 years) having the longest LTC days. Our study suggests that the intervention had a robust immediate effect, which was maintained in the post-intervention period, thus highlighting its lasting impact. Since its implementation, the FOCUS program has significantly shortened the days of linkage to care for people with hepatitis C. We noted the positive impacts across the different demographics studied. More importantly, the impacts were sustainable through the COVID-19 pandemic. We need future efforts to engage middle-aged groups to further reduce the hepatitis C LTC days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.