ArticleThe New phytologist2025
Intraspecific variation in plant-fungal interactions across tidal elevation in a salt marsh.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rhizosphere Fungal Community Responses to Nitrogen Addition Reflect Genotypic Versus Trait Variation in the Marsh Sedge Schoenoplectus americanus Over Time.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Mating portfolio and neutral mechanisms are primary causes of genet-ramet frequencies and spatial distributions in smooth cordgrass (Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interspecific interactions vary depending on environmental and genetic factors, with intraspecific variation potentially altering these relationships. Specifically, intraspecific variation within host plants and their endosymbionts may affect above- and belowground interactions depending on environmental conditions. We examined how intraspecific variation within the salt marsh foundation species Spartina alterniflora and a common fungal root endosymbiont (Lulworthia sp.) affected their interactions. We conducted a glasshouse experiment comparing interactions between Spartina growth forms (tall-form from low marsh and short-form from high marsh) and Lulworthia isolates from different marsh locations, and a laboratory experiment exposing Lulworthia isolates from both endpoints of a tidal elevation gradient to different salinities. Intraspecific variation affected fungal characteristics, plant traits, and plant-fungal interactions. Lulworthia isolates distinguished by a single-nucleotide polymorphism had distinct morphologies and different salinity-dependent growth rates. Spartina origin zone affected plant responses. Fungal treatment also affected plant performance: one isolate reduced Spartina density, height, biomass, and respiration - particularly for tall-form plants - whereas the other isolate had neutral to positive effects relative to the control. Our results highlight how intraspecific variation in both fungal isolates and plant genotypes shapes plant-fungal interactions and mediates the capacity of host plants to respond to changing conditions depending on plant ecotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.