ReviewCurrent opinion in oncology2025
Minimally invasive surgery in advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer: current evidence and future directions.
Review in Current opinion in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in advanced ovarian cancer management following neoadjuvant chemotherapy yields potential benefits in patient recovery and quality of life compared with traditional open surgery. MIS techniques, including robot-assisted procedures, have been increasingly utilized in recent years despite ongoing debates about their oncologic safety. RECENT
findingsRecent prospective and retrospective studies indicate that MIS for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can achieve similar cytoreductive outcomes (no visible residual disease, CC-0) to laparotomy in carefully selected patients. Key reported advantages include reduced perioperative morbidity, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital stays. Nonetheless, current data are limited by patient selection bias, power of the studies to detect differences, and concerns about accurately detecting small-volume disease laparoscopically. Ongoing randomized controlled trials, such as the LANCE trial, are expected to provide robust evidence to clarify oncologic outcomes of MIS. Additionally, early studies indicate MIS might be feasible for selected cases of recurrent ovarian cancer. SUMMARY: MIS is emerging as a viable and potentially advantageous alternative to open surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, provided careful patient selection and surgical expertise. Definitive conclusions about long-term oncologic outcomes and recurrence require results from randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.