ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2025
[Corrigendum] miR‑335 promotes ferroptosis by targeting ferritin heavy chain 1 in in vivo and in vitro models of Parkinson's disease.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- miRNA-Mediated Regulation of Ferroptosis in Neurological Disorders: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, for the JC‑1 staining experiments shown in Fig. 5F on p. 9, the 'mimic NC' and 'inhibitor' panels appeared to show the same cells, even though the green/red ratio was different comparing between the two data panels. In addition, two further instances of duplicated data panels were identified in Figs. S2 and S3, such that data that were allegedly obtained under different experimental conditions appeared to have been derived from the same original sources. After having asked the authors to explain the errors that had occurred in assembling these figures, they responded to explain that the error in Fig. 5F resulted from the incorrect selection of source images for the channels during the image merging process, whereas the errors in Figs. S2 and S3 occurred due to mistakes made in the naming and management of image files during storage. This led to the unintentional use of incorrect images during the process of figure assembly. Moreover, the authors were able to present to the Editorial Office the original data from the JC‑1 staining experiments belonging to Fig. 5F. The Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.