Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025
Post-authorisation safety study to assess the risk of urinary tract cancer in people with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin: A multi-country European study.
Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Post-authorisation safety study to assess the risk of urinary tract cancer in people with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin: A multi-country European study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to assess the risk of urinary tract cancers (UTCs), including bladder and renal cancers, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating empagliflozin compared with people initiating any dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) in the United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, and Finland. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a non-interventional, multi-country cohort study based on secondary data in Sweden, Finland, and the UK. The study used an active comparator, new user design and included propensity score-matched adults with T2D initiating empagliflozin or a DPP-4i between 2014 and 2020 (2021 for the UK). Follow-up started at the index date (first prescription or dispensation for empagliflozin or a DPP-4i) and 180 days were considered as the latency period. Incidence rates (IRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated under an as-treated approach in each country. HRs were then entered into a random-effects meta-analysis.
resultsThe main analyses included 151 055 matched people. The mean age for empagliflozin initiators was 57.0-63.2 years across the countries, and most were female (59.6%-67.8%). A meta-analysis of country-level HR showed no evidence of an increased risk of UTC (adjusted HR = 0.88, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.66-1.17), bladder cancer (adjusted HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.63-1.33) or renal cancer (adjusted HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.57-1.38) for empagliflozin initiators compared with DPP-4i initiators. Various sensitivity analyses also validated the robustness of the main findings.
conclusionsNo increased risk of UTC, bladder, and renal cancer was observed when empagliflozin initiators were compared with DPP-4i initiators in this non-interventional cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.