ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Effectiveness of Instrument-assisted Soft-tissue Mobilization Versus Dry Cupping on Pain and Cervical Range of Motion in Treatment of Neck Pain.
Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neck pain is characterized by symptoms of a nonspecific nature of the pain, which is of mechanical origin.[12] Frequently observed manifestations of neck discomfort encompass muscle pain, muscle spasms, headaches, facet joint pain, nerve pain, referred pain, and bone pain.[3] Instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization (IASTM) stands as a proficient myofascial intervention used for the treatment of soft tissues. Here, using instruments typically crafted from stainless steel featuring beveled edges and anatomically contoured designs to accommodate various body regions, this technique allows for enhanced depth of penetration.[4] Primarily used for the identification and therapeutic management of soft-tissue disorders, the approach involves the application of these specialized instruments.[5] Dry cupping, alternatively recognized as air cupping or suction cupping, constitutes a therapeutic methodology, wherein a vacuum is generated within cups and subsequently applied to targeted regions of the body. These cups, fabricated from diverse materials such as glass, silicone, or plastic, induce suction effects. Through the application of this suction, dry cupping serves to promote circulation, alleviate muscle tension, and facilitate the energetic flow within the treated areas. Material and Methods: The purpose of the study to effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization versus dry cupping on pain and cervical range of motion in treatment of neck pain. The study is comparative in nature, and total subjects were 15 subjects in each group. The assessment of pain and range of motion of cervical flexion and lateral flexion were taken before starting the treatment of both the groups. The patients were randomly assigned by lottery method for both the groups, and assessments were taken on 0 day and at the end of 4 Results: In IASTM treatment, the Conclusion: The study conclude that the dry cupping is more beneficial for the treatment of neck pain and range of motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.