Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511407›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Mito Stress Assay of PBMCs With Seahorse XFe96 Flux Analyzer and Comparison of Poly-D-Lysine and Poly-L-Lysine for Cell Affinity.

Kumudu Subasinghe, Raymond Berry, Megan Rowe, Ali Winters, Shaohua Yang, Nicole Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kumudu SubasingheDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Raymond BerryDepartment of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Megan RoweDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Ali WintersDepartment of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Shaohua YangDepartment of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Nicole PhillipsDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Seahorse 96 XF Analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) has been an effective tool in non-invasively measuring mitochondrial function for the past decade. It is a high-throughput respirometer that is considered the "gold standard" for quantifying mitochondrial function and bioenergetics in cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) play a selective role in immune system responses and are key components of human immunity. Recent studies have suggested that these cell populations provide an overview of systemic changes within the body and therefore provide a source of sensitive biomarkers. Assessing mitochondrial function in PBMCs has been shown to provide an indication of metabolic stress associated with diseases such as diabetes and neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease. In this protocol, we use two adhesive compounds, Poly-D-Lysine (PDL) and Poly-L-Lysine (PLL), at 50 μg/mL each per well, to immobilize PBMCs to a specialized Seahorse microplate to perform mitochondrial stress assay using the Seahorse Analyzer. We compared six cell densities of PBMCs to identify the optimal cell density for use in Seahorse Mito Stress analysis. This protocol includes the immobilization of freshly isolated PBM cells into a Seahorse microplate, hydration and calibration of the sensor cartridge, cell seeding, running the Seahorse Analyzer for the Mito Stress test, and simple data analysis to compare the effectiveness of PLL and PDL as the coating agent for PBMCs. The data analysis indicates that there is no statistical difference between PLL and PDL. Key features • Designed for Seahorse 96-XF Analyzer, allowing it to work with lower cell densities and accommodate a greater number of replicates with high-throughput capabilities. • Two widely used cell adhesive compounds, Poly-D-Lysine and Poly-L-Lysine, are compared for their effectiveness in immobilizing PBMCs onto specialized Seahorse microplates. • The protocol takes two days to complete.

Indexed as

Mitochondrial functionPeripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)Poly-D-LysinePoly-L-LysineSeahorse 96 XF AnalyzerXF cell Mito Stress test

Identifiers

PMID40511407
PMCPMC12152111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.