Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511383›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

From data to insights: a tool for comprehensive Quantification of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (QoCGM).

Simon Cichosz, Stine Hangaard, Thomas Kronborg, Peter Vestergaard, Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon CichoszDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.
Stine HangaardDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.
Thomas KronborgDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.
Peter VestergaardSteno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Morten Hasselstrøm JensenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become a important technology in the management and research of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, providing real-time data on glucose fluctuations that were previously inaccessible with traditional monitoring methods. Numerous analytical tools have been developed for platforms like R and Python to calculate standard metrics and extract insights from CGM data. However, these tools often fail to address the full spectrum of analytical requirements. Furthermore, there is a lack of updated, open-source tools tailored for MATrix LABoratory (MATLAB)-a platform widely used by the research community. To address this gap, we introduce Quantification of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (QoCGM), a comprehensive, open-source post-hoc analytical tool for CGM data specifically designed for MATLAB. A case study involving 324 individuals with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) demonstrates the utility of QoCGM, highlighting the distinct aspects of glucose dynamics captured by different CGM-derived metrics through an analysis of their coefficients of determination (

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Continuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleHumansInsulinMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseInsulinContinuous glucose monitoringContinuous overall net glycemic actionDiabetes mellitusGlycemic risk indexMean amplitude of glycemic excursionsMetricsSoftwareT2DMTime-in-Range

Identifiers

PMID40511383
PMCPMC12161138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.