Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511368›Full record

ArticleNational science review2025

Deciphering failure paths in lithium metal anodes by electrochemical curve fingerprints.

Zhihong Piao, Zhiyuan Han, Shengyu Tao, Mengtian Zhang, Gongxun Lu, Lin Su, Xinru Wu, Yanze Song, Xiao Xiao, Xuan Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhihong PiaoTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Zhiyuan HanTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Shengyu TaoTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Mengtian ZhangTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Gongxun LuTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Lin SuTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xinru WuTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yanze SongTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xiao XiaoTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xuan ZhangTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Guangmin ZhouTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Hui-Ming ChengInstitute of Technology for Carbon Neutrality, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding anode failure mechanisms in lithium metal batteries (LMBs) is crucial for their use in energy storage, as the anode directly affects battery stability and electrolyte selection. Unfortunately, post-mortem methods reveal failure outcomes but often miss dynamic progressions, obscuring cause-and-effect relationships in failure evolution. Leveraging domain knowledge informed machine learning and a 4-year dataset of over 18 000 cycles and 12 million data points, from cells cycled to failure, we uncovered a correlation between initial lithium plating/stripping behavior and subsequent anode changes, enabling the identification of early indicators for distinct failure types. Our model accurately predicts failure types using only the first two cycles, less than 2% of the data, demonstrating the effectiveness of initial curve features as electrochemical fingerprints. Key electrochemical fingerprints describing lithium microstructure and its interphase with the electrolyte are validated to be critical to kinetics and reversibility degradation. Specifically, the fingerprints influence the formation of ineffective interphase regions (lacking intimate contact with the lithium metal) and inactive lithium, which in turn lengthen charge carrier (lithium-ion and electron) transport paths, leading to poorer kinetics and reversibility. The fingerprints and model generalize well across typical published electrolyte systems with low misidentification, demonstrating versatility and practicality. Broadly, this study using a pre-mortem prediction method deepens understanding of lithium metal anode failure mechanisms by uncovering the root causes of kinetics and reversibility degradation from fingerprints hidden in initial cycles instead of a post-mortem manner, facilitating the rapid assessment of battery reliability and development of electrolytes.

Indexed as

electrochemical curvesfailure mechanismlithium metal anodeslithium metal batteriesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40511368
PMCPMC12153722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.