ArticleNational science review2025
Deciphering failure paths in lithium metal anodes by electrochemical curve fingerprints.
Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Conduction-Nucleation-Competition-Guided 3D Adaptive Gradient Buffer for Dendrite-Free All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Nanoscale Synthesis for Electrocatalytic Performance: From Data-Driven Methodologies to Closed-Loop Optimization.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Accelerated Electrode-Electrolyte Interface Design in Rechargeable Li-Based Batteries.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Interfacial Self-Healing Polymer Electrolytes With Gradient Covalent-Noncovalent Dynamic Bonds for 4.6 V-Class Lithium Metal Batteries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Unraveling the interparticle strain dynamics in battery electrodes.National science review · 2026Article
- Article
- Uncovering battery electrochemical mechanisms by artificial intelligence.National science review · 2025Review
- Predicting lithium metal anode failure at an early stage.National science review · 2025Article
- Beyond lithium-ion batteries: what's powering tomorrow's breakthroughs?National science review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding anode failure mechanisms in lithium metal batteries (LMBs) is crucial for their use in energy storage, as the anode directly affects battery stability and electrolyte selection. Unfortunately, post-mortem methods reveal failure outcomes but often miss dynamic progressions, obscuring cause-and-effect relationships in failure evolution. Leveraging domain knowledge informed machine learning and a 4-year dataset of over 18 000 cycles and 12 million data points, from cells cycled to failure, we uncovered a correlation between initial lithium plating/stripping behavior and subsequent anode changes, enabling the identification of early indicators for distinct failure types. Our model accurately predicts failure types using only the first two cycles, less than 2% of the data, demonstrating the effectiveness of initial curve features as electrochemical fingerprints. Key electrochemical fingerprints describing lithium microstructure and its interphase with the electrolyte are validated to be critical to kinetics and reversibility degradation. Specifically, the fingerprints influence the formation of ineffective interphase regions (lacking intimate contact with the lithium metal) and inactive lithium, which in turn lengthen charge carrier (lithium-ion and electron) transport paths, leading to poorer kinetics and reversibility. The fingerprints and model generalize well across typical published electrolyte systems with low misidentification, demonstrating versatility and practicality. Broadly, this study using a pre-mortem prediction method deepens understanding of lithium metal anode failure mechanisms by uncovering the root causes of kinetics and reversibility degradation from fingerprints hidden in initial cycles instead of a post-mortem manner, facilitating the rapid assessment of battery reliability and development of electrolytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.