Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511359›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

Is Autograft Reconstruction Successful in the Treatment of Chronic Acromioclavicular Separation?

Semih Yaş, Muhammed Şakir Çalta, Asim Ahmadov, Mehmet Ali Tokgöz, Baran Sarıkaya, Ulunay Kanatlı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Semih YaşDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Health Sciences University Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7823-3400
Muhammed Şakir ÇaltaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Asim AhmadovDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Mehmet Ali TokgözDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Baran SarıkayaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ulunay KanatlıDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to present the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with chronic AC joint separation who underwent an autograft and double endobutton application. In addition, we examined the results of patients who had coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon, without the use of implants. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 21 patients who underwent CC ligament complex reconstruction surgery for chronic AC joint separation. All patients were evaluated in our hospital using history taking, clinical examination, radiologic evaluation, Constant, Taft and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) scores. Results: The postoperative follow-up period had a mean of 37.3 months (min 15 months-max 68 months). The results of the study revealed significant improvements in clinical scores post-surgery among the 21 male patients with chronic AC joint separation. Specifically, the Constant, Taft, and ACJI scores all showed statistically significant increases from preoperative to postoperative assessments ( Conclusion: This study shows that reconstruction with autogenous graft in chronic AC separation cases yields successful results in terms of functional scores and radiologic measurements. Level of evidence: Level 4, Treatment Studies.

Indexed as

Acromioclavicular dislocationAcromioclavicular separationChronic dislocationClinical resultsGracilis tendon autograftReconstruction with autograft

Identifiers

PMID40511359
PMCPMC12151935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.