ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Is DHS with Fibular Strut Graft Superior for the Fixation of Comminuted Femoral Neck Fractures (FNF)? A Comparative Analysis with New Implant Femoral Neck System.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The dynamic hip screw with fibular strut graft (DHS-FG) is a treatment method for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with multiple cortex comminution. Femoral neck systems (FNS) improve stability and prevent excessive neck shortening in FNFs. However, no comparative studies exist to determine method superiority. This study assesses the effectiveness and complications of DHS-FG versus FNS in treating comminuted FNFs. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (age 18-50) admitted to our institution with comminuted FNFs from January 2015 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DHS-FG (21 patients) and FNS (29 patients). Comparison parameters included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications (nonunion, neck shortening, avascular necrosis). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using Harris Hip Score at final follow-up. Results: We followed all 50 patients for 24-72 months (mean 30 ± 2.07 months). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, fracture classification, postoperative neck shaft angle, and tip-apex distance. However, the union rate differed significantly between DHS-FG and FNS groups ( Conclusion: In comminuted FNFs, DHS-FG demonstrated superior union rates and lower complication rates than FNS. DHS-FG may be an effective treatment option for this fracture type, requiring further research to explore potential benefits and limitations of FNS in this context. Level of Evidence: III. Level of Clinical Care: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.