ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Suprascapular Nerve Entrapment: Current Concepts and Recent Advances.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Implications of Anatomical Variations in Nerves and Adjacent Structures for Regional Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome caused by a spinoglenoid notch cyst with a concomitant giant lipoma: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The suprascapular nerve is inherently vulnerable to entrapment, as it is relatively constrained by its surrounding anatomy: proximally crossing the suprascapular notch; or more distally over the spinoglenoid notch. Despite this, suprascapular nerve entrapment is relatively uncommon, and has until recently been an underappreciated cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. Causes and Assessment: Aetiology is typically due to traction or compression nerve injury, and a number of high-risk variants in anatomy have now been described. The symptoms are best investigated with magnetic resonance imaging and electrodiagnostic evaluation, with X-ray, ultrasound and CT scans useful in excluding common differential diagnoses, and possible future roles for MR neurography and diagnostic suprascapular nerve block. Management: The majority of patients respond well to non-operative management, with a multimodal non-operative approach thought to optimise outcomes. The role of neuromodulation in non-operative management continues to evolve, but has shown promising early results. For patients with a clear compressive structural lesion, or where symptoms are refractory to non-operative management, surgery is required. There are now well-established techniques for both arthroscopic and open approaches to suprascapular and spinoglenoid decompression. Outcomes from isolated suprascapular nerve decompression have been consistently impressive, but the use of suprascapular nerve decompression as an adjunct to associated rotator cuff repair or stabilisation procedures had been observed to attracted a relatively high rate of complication, prompting speculation that it may be advisable to maintain a high threshold for adjunct nerve decompression procedures: where there is known suprascapular nerve neuropathy or the presence of high-risk anatomical variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.