ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Effects of smartphone use in various floor sitting positions on spinal and pelvic alignment and gluteal pressure in healthy adults.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study investigated the effects of prolonged sitting and smartphone use on the craniocervical angle (CCA), trunk flexion angle (TFA), pelvic obliquity, and gluteal pressure asymmetry in healthy adults. [Participants and Methods] Thirty healthy participants used smartphones for 30 min in three sitting positions: cross-legged, side sitting, and long sitting. Cervical and lumbar angles, pelvic obliquity, and gluteal pressure asymmetry were measured at the start of upright sitting, 30 s, 10 min, 20 min, and 30 min. Visual 3D software was used for data collection and analysis. [Results] CCA and TFA progressively decreased in all three positions. Significant CCA reductions were observed at 30 min in both cross-legged and side sitting positions, and as early as 30 s in long sitting. TFA decreased significantly at all measured times in side sitting, and at most intervals in cross-legged sitting, but not in long sitting. Pelvic obliquity increased significantly in both cross-legged and side sitting, while remaining unchanged in long sitting. Gluteal pressure asymmetry significantly increased at 30 s in cross-legged sitting and at all intervals in side sitting, with no significant changes in long sitting. [Conclusion] If prolonged floor sitting is unavoidable, adopting a symmetrical long sitting posture is preferable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.