ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
The Role of Dental Practitioners in Promoting Electric Toothbrushes: A Knowledge Practice Assessment Evaluation.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surface roughness of enamel and cention N after toothpaste brushing: AnBioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electric toothbrushes are more effective than manual brushes for cleaning teeth, removing plaque, and preventing dental complications. However, there is limited evidence on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of dental professionals towards their use. This study aims to assess awareness, perceived relevance, and application of electric toothbrushes among dentists and dental students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using structured self-administered questionnaires, targeting 302 participants including dental students, private practitioners, and academic faculty. The questionnaire administered online and in person consisted of two sections: knowledge, assessment, and practice assessment. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: The knowledge assessment, 72.5% of participants had prior knowledge about electric toothbrushes and 68.2% associated them with improved oral care. In the practice assessment, 61.3% had never recommended electric toothbrushes in practice or training, but 70.5% expressed willingness to do so in the future. Perceived capability of utilizing electric toothbrushes was rated as average (3/5) 41.5% and as high (4 or 5/5) 18.3%. Conclusion: Despite positive attitudes toward electric toothbrushes, their use remains limited among dental professionals. Participants recognize the need for more education and resources to bridge gaps and knowledge and confidence regarding electric toothbrushes in dental practice are essential for modern oral care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.