ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Evaluation of Effect of Interproximal Reduction in Enamel in Orthodontic Therapy: An Original Research.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Interproximal reduction (IPR) is an orthodontic technique used to address space constraints by removing small amounts of enamel between teeth. This research aims to evaluate the impact of IPR on enamel surface integrity, tooth sensitivity, and the long-term stability of orthodontic results. Methods: The study was conducted on a sample of 50 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Three parameters were evaluated: changes in enamel thickness pre- and post-IPR, post-treatment sensitivity using a visual analog scale, and relapse tendencies measured over a 12-month follow-up. Data were statistically analyzed using paired Results: Enamel thickness was reduced by an average of 0.25 mm post-IPR ( Conclusion: IPR is a safe and effective method in orthodontic treatment with minimal enamel reduction, mild short-term sensitivity, and no significant long-term relapse. These findings support the continued use of IPR as a conservative approach to space management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.