ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Salivary Biomarkers vs. Conventional Biopsy for Oral Cancer Detection in India: A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systems biology network analysis of root resorption biomarkers and their clinical relevance in orthodontics: a pilot study.Genomics & informatics · 2026Article
- Salivary glutathione versus selenium as an oral cancer risk biomarker: A case-control study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Immunological Analysis of Oral Cytobrush Specimens for Early Detection of Oral Cancer Biomarkers: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluation of salivary biomarkers predicting oral disease activity in apparently healthy individuals.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Oral cancer, predominantly oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), constitutes a major global health concern with alarmingly high-morbidity and mortality rates. Early detection is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of salivary biomarkers against conventional biopsy in detecting oral cancer. Methods: This prospective study recruited 120 participants with suspected oral lesions from the People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, India. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected and analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for a panel of four biomarkers: interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF- Results: Salivary analysis revealed significantly elevated levels of all four biomarkers in patients with OSCC compared to those with benign lesions. The combined biomarker panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 80%, PPV of 76%, and NPV of 91% in detecting OSCC. In comparison, scalpel biopsy exhibited a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 98%. Conclusion: While scalpel biopsy remains the gold standard for OSCC diagnosis, our findings suggest that salivary biomarkers, particularly when used in combination, offer a promising adjunctive tool for oral cancer detection. This non-invasive approach may prove valuable in identifying high-risk individuals who require further investigation with biopsy, potentially leading to earlier diagnosis and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.