Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511207›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of PMMA Reinforced with Graphene (G-CAM) and Monolithic Zirconia - An

Harshita Sachdev, Mukesh Soni, Alka Gupta, Harsh Chansoria, Megha Patil, Bhavya Sharma, Kritika Kar, Ranjana Sharma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Harshita SachdevDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, GDC, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Mukesh SoniDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, GDC, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Alka GuptaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, GDC, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Harsh ChansoriaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, GDC, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Megha PatilDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, GDC, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Bhavya SharmaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, GDC, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Kritika KarDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, GDC, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ranjana SharmaDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Shalinitai Meghe College of Nursing, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimal flexural strength is a critical prerequisite for materials used in fabricating prosthetic frameworks. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the Flexural strength (FS) of two CAD/CAM materials used in dental prostheses, namely polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) reinforced with graphene (GCAM) and Monolithic Zirconia. Materials and Methods: In this Results: Compared to GCAM samples, each Monolithic Zirconia sample showed significantly higher values of flexural strength ( Conclusion: The results show that GCAM is a promising material to be used for prosthetic purposes where less strength and greater resiliency are required.

Indexed as

Flexural strengthmonolithic zirconiapolymethyl methacrylate

Identifiers

PMID40511207
PMCPMC12156603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.