ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Use of Clear Aligners Compared to Conventional Fixed Braces.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sustainable clear aligner practice in esthetic and prosthetic dentistry: a scoping review for practical implementation.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Speech and mastication difficulties: Clear aligners versus conventional braces.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Novel antimicrobial and bioactive resin-based clear aligner attachment orthodontic materials.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between clear aligners and conventional fixed braces. Orthodontic treatments not only focus on functional outcomes but also patient satisfaction, comfort, and aesthetics. Understanding PROs can guide treatment decisions for better patient-centered care. Methods: A comparative study involving 150 orthodontic patients treated with either clear aligners or conventional braces was conducted. The PROs evaluated included comfort, aesthetics, oral hygiene maintenance, and speech impairment. Surveys were administered at the beginning and at regular intervals during treatment. Data were analyzed using statistical tests to compare the two groups. Results: Clear aligners showed superior outcomes in comfort and aesthetics, with a significant difference ( Conclusion: Clear aligners are associated with higher comfort and aesthetic satisfaction, while conventional braces may be less favorable in terms of hygiene and speech. PROs play a crucial role in orthodontic treatment selection, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches based on patient preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.